back to problem page
Whitepaper · v0.1·progress & abundance·open to refutation

An optimism.fun request for startups

Financial infrastructure

Move value for everyone at near-zero cost, on rails not owned by a sixty-year-old duopoly.

Published

2026-08-22

Authors

optimism.fun

Status

Draft · v0.1

License

CC BY 4.0

§1abstract

The four-axis ranking

We rank humanity’s most important problems on four quantifiable dimensions — quantity of humans affected, severity per capita, current solution quality, and addressable market size — and package each as a proposal in the spirit of Musk’s Hyperloop Alpha. This document is the proposal for financial infrastructure. Every number below is sourced and tagged with confidence. Every ranking is a conjecture, open to refutation.

Quantity · humans affected

1.3B

high

Severity · WTP / wealth

300%

low

Current solutions

70.0 / 10

med

Market size · TAM

$2.5T

high
§2problem statement

What we are trying to solve

Global payments generate roughly $2.5 trillion in annual revenue on about $2.0 quadrillion of value flows, and two companies founded in 1958 and 1966 hold roughly $1.2 trillion of the card rail between them. This is the rare category whose incumbent ceiling does not cap out: Visa sits at its all-time high after 68 years, and JPMorgan is close to becoming the first trillion-dollar bank. Added to this index in August 2026 as the fifth problem clearing the $1T bar, and the only new one to survive a nineteen-candidate screen (see TRILLION_DOLLAR_SCREEN.md). Two honest caveats travel with it. The humanitarian case is the weakest of the five: 1.3 billion adults remain unbanked, but account ownership already reached 79 percent of adults, and Nubank, the most successful bank-the-unbanked company ever built, is worth $70 billion, which settles where the trillion is not. And the category is heavily defended: US merchant processing fees hit a record $198.25 billion in 2025, the year after stablecoin legislation passed, so no disruption is yet visible in the fee data.

§3why it persists

The gap between the world and the world that is physically possible

Current solution quality is rated 70.0 / 10 (med confidence) — meaning there is substantial unclaimed ground between what exists and what is possible. card rails work well for the banked; the gap is cost, settlement latency, and the unbanked tail.

§4existing alternatives

Who is already working on this

No companies have yet been tagged to this problem in the dataset. If you know one, open a PR.

§5proposed direction

If we solve this, here is the world we get

Section in progress

The success vision and technical proposal for this problem are still being drafted. New whitepaper sections ship with each Monday newsletter drop. Subscribe to get the upgrade, or contribute on GitHub.

§6cost & scale

What the market can pay

The world is already paying $2.5T per year against this problem (McKinsey Global Payments Report 2025: $2.5T revenue on ~$2.0 quadrillion of value flows, forecast above $3T by 2029; high confidence).

A successful solution does not need to capture more — it needs to redirect a meaningful slice of existing spend, plus the latent willingness-to-pay implied by the severity score above. The cost ceiling for a real solution is bounded by this number; everything cheaper is dominated, everything more expensive is a non-starter.

§7safety & considerations

What could go wrong, and how we know we are not wrong

Section in progress

Failure modes, ethical considerations, and the conditions under which this whitepaper would be falsified are being authored as the weekly cadence ships. The Deutschian commitment: every claim above is a conjecture; we publish the conditions under which we would update. New whitepaper sections ship with each Monday newsletter drop. Subscribe to get the upgrade, or contribute on GitHub.

§8suggested investors

Who would back this

Section in progress

No capital allocators have yet been tagged to this problem in the dataset. New whitepaper sections ship with each Monday newsletter drop. Subscribe to get the upgrade, or contribute on GitHub.

§9sources & criticism invite

Where this is wrong, tell us

Every number on this page carries a source and a confidence tag. Every section open to refutation. If a citation is wrong, a number is stale, or a conjecture is unfounded — file a correction.

corrections → use the feedback widget in the nav · open issue at github.com/adamtpang/optimism.fun

Weekly whitepaper drop

One problem.One whitepaper. Every week.

Each week we ship a deep-dive whitepaper on a top-ranked humanity-scale problem — built in the spirit of Musk’s Hyperloop Alpha and the transformer paper. Problem + market size + before/after vision + a proposed solution + the investors who would back it. Humanity’s Requests for Startups, sourced and sorted quantitatively. No spam. No marketing.

optimism.fun uses your email address only to send low-volume project updates through Resend. You can unsubscribe with one click at any time; read the privacy policy.